On 2/27/15, 4:29 PM, "Leigh" wrote:
>On 27 February 2015 at 21:14, Tom Worster wrote:
>
>> I don't see why we couldn't sponsor an effort to encourage adoption
>> of this or some such interoperability protocol. Go to FIG, see if the
>> Rails, Node and Django people are interested, and so fourth..
On 27 February 2015 at 21:14, Tom Worster wrote:
> 1. You say it "doesn't leave any room for interoperability" but I'm
> not sure I agree. I invite you again to look at the Cryptography lib
> for Python.
There are countless applications/services that will do things "their
own way", and the odds o
On 2/26/15 11:12 AM, Leigh wrote:> On 26 February 2015 at 15:37, Tom
Worster wrote:
> I've spoken with Anthony and a couple of others about something in the
> same vein as the new csprng functions. I think core needs a pair of
> functions that handles the needs of the 99%. Those functions are.
>
