thanks for answering my question,
green, green, I am so green
On 11/17/08, Igor Feghali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe because "0" evaluating to false is already enough and everything
> after that would be "forcing" too much. If "0.0" evaluates to false
> then I would ask, why "0.0E1" doesn
maybe because "0" evaluating to false is already enough and everything
after that would be "forcing" too much. If "0.0" evaluates to false
then I would ask, why "0.0E1" doesn't ? What about "0.0E2" ? "0.0E10"
? etc. Just my opinion.
regards,
Igor.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Ting Chen <[EMA
i am recently studying Php5 manul. This is one of the examinations in
the book. The answer is "0.0" is true rather than false. I am very
curious about why if the answer is not wrong.
green geen still green~
On 11/17/08, Andrew Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Ting Chen <[EMAIL PROTEC
Andrew Rose wrote:
2008/11/17 Ting Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi everybody,
sorry this is a greenhand's stupid question. Why isn't "0.0" false? I
know it is a string but I still think it equals to 0.
I think you answered your own question there.
Andrew
What he means is that == is not trans
2008/11/17 Ting Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi everybody,
>
> sorry this is a greenhand's stupid question. Why isn't "0.0" false? I
> know it is a string but I still think it equals to 0.
>
I think you answered your own question there.
Andrew
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L
Hi everybody,
sorry this is a greenhand's stupid question. Why isn't "0.0" false? I
know it is a string but I still think it equals to 0.
Thanks ahead, green green~~
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
