At 08:42 PM 12/7/2003 +0100, Paul Hudson wrote:
Andi,
Wouldn't it be more useful if they worked for all variables, or is there a
design reason why they work as they do currently?
The idea is that you can mix regular variables and variable overloading, it
is like this by design. If you want it to
Andi,
Wouldn't it be more useful if they worked for all variables, or is there a
design reason why they work as they do currently?
--Paul
> Yes, you are right. They only work if the variable is not defined.
>
> Andi
>
> At 08:03 PM 12/7/2003 +0100, Paul Hudson wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >I've been
Yes, you are right. They only work if the variable is not defined.
Andi
At 08:03 PM 12/7/2003 +0100, Paul Hudson wrote:
All,
I've been poking around with these two functions while testing the build from
CVS, and am not sure how they're supposed to work. From what I can gather,
they are only cal
All,
I've been poking around with these two functions while testing the build from
CVS, and am not sure how they're supposed to work. From what I can gather,
they are only called when changing a variable that wasn't in the class
definition. I say that because I took the example script from
h
