Re: [PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote: > Yeah, unless someone objects that'd be great. What's about its brother XMLWriter (even as experimental)? --Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsu

Re: [PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Wez Furlong
Done (can be easily backed out if somone finds a good reason). --Wez. On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, unless someone objects that'd be great. > > Thanks, > > Andi > > At 08:37 PM 2/7/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote: > >This is usually done by s

Re: [PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Wez Furlong
This is usually done by symlinking in the repository; I can do this if you like. --Wez. On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:16:00 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If no one objects then we can go ahead and do it. > Anyone know if this is done via the modules file or if it requires other > CVS

Re: [PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
Yeah, unless someone objects that'd be great. Thanks, Andi At 08:37 PM 2/7/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote: This is usually done by symlinking in the repository; I can do this if you like. --Wez. On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:16:00 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If no one objects then we

Re: [PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
I think that's OK. Would you deal with having the docs merged into the PHP Manual? If no one objects then we can go ahead and do it. Anyone know if this is done via the modules file or if it requires other CVS magic? Andi At 04:28 PM 2/7/2005 +0100, Christian Stocker wrote: Hi As briefly mention

[PHP-DEV] XMLReader in PHP 5.1

2005-02-07 Thread Christian Stocker
Hi As briefly mentioned at the start of the long PHP 5.1 thread, I'd like to include XMLReader in the standard PHP 5.1 distribution. XMLReader is in my opinion far superior to the sax extension and should therefore be included for more widespread use. I'm not in the position to decide, if it sh