Hi,
To revive this ancient thread. We have made some progress getting these
builds made for Windows again.
Shivam has been working on an extension builder for Windows
(https://github.com/php/php-windows-builder?tab=readme-ov-file#build-a-php-extension)
— GHA actions to build your DLLs on rele
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023, 3:33 PM Casper Langemeijer
wrote:
> Nothing seems to happen on this front, and our Windows users like to move
> to PHP 8.2 too.
>
> The windows.php.net site states: "This is because the Windows PECL build
> machine died, and the team is still working on the long term plan of
Nothing seems to happen on this front, and our Windows users like to move to
PHP 8.2 too.
The windows.php.net site states: "This is because the Windows PECL build
machine died, and the team is still working on the long term plan of building
DLLs for PECL extensions with a new CI process."
We a
Hello,
I wonder if we could not use on demand resources for the builds (like
windows gh actions) and use the normal distribution mirrors setup?
Pierre
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023, 8:10 PM JEDI_BC / Bruno CHALOPIN
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 11/07/2022 18:25, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> > On 11.07.2022 at 17:
Hi
On 11/07/2022 18:25, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? because that
would definitely be a great solution if it was possible/feasible .
No. It is only unlikely that automated uploads to
Hi
On 11/07/2022 18:25, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? because that
would definitely be a great solution if it was possible/feasible .
No. It is only unlikely that automated uploads to
.. should have written "making the cpus run hotter and clock lower and
harming single-thread performance without significantly increasing total
throughput, sometimes even harming total throughput" - and making it harder
to see how much *actual* cpu is being used by a process (a process
seemingly us
10 days of radio silence? What's going on? anyway benchmarks (countsey of
bench.sh ) of the server/bandwidth
A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ---
Version: v2022-06-01
Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
Fwiw Chris Haas / vendiadvertising.com has reached out, they're willing to
sponsor raid(1) if my proposal is accepted.
Haas is reading this mailing list, but does not wish to participate/post
directly at present.
(I have no prior relation, never heard of them before today)
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 2
i have a 40-core 128GB RAM server with 1 (and only 1) static ipv4 address
that I intend to keep around until at least 27 november 2025 (but unsure
after that),
it has more RAM/CPU than i need, and i could set up a virtual machine on it
and give VNC access to the VM in the form of
> ssh -L :loca
On 11.07.2022 at 21:04, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> Any of you windows.php.net guys familiar with SSH? Can one be created?
That would be possible (needed to be set-up by Alex Schoenmaker), but
while that could solve the upload issue, it wouldn't solve the other
issue I've mentioned, namely that w
Any of you windows.php.net guys familiar with SSH? Can one be created?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 19:52, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 11.07.2022 at 18:53, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
>
> > Is there any SSH public key associated with the Windows php developers?
> Or
> > with CMB?
>
> No. At least n
On 11.07.2022 at 18:53, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> Is there any SSH public key associated with the Windows php developers? Or
> with CMB?
No. At least not regarding windows.php.net.
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:25, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
>> On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrot
Is there any SSH public key associated with the Windows php developers? Or
with CMB?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:25, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
>
> > Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? because that
> > would definitely b
On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? because that
> would definitely be a great solution if it was possible/feasible .
No. It is only unlikely that automated uploads to window.php.net will
ever be possible using GH actio
Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? because that
would definitely be a great solution if it was possible/feasible .
Anyway, with regards to "I don't think there are special requirements
regarding the hardware", can you give a rough estimate on RAM/disk space
requirements?
On 11.07.2022 at 09:27, James Titcumb wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 15:29, Calvin Buckley wrote:
>
>> If I could set up a workflow that when I tag a release, it pushes a full
>> matrix to PECL, that would be great.
>
> Any info on whether this is possible, or may be possible in the future? I
> t
Hi folks
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 15:29, Calvin Buckley wrote:
> If I could set up a workflow that when I tag a release, it pushes a full
> matrix to PECL, that would be great.
>
Any info on whether this is possible, or may be possible in the future? I
too have set up a pipeline to build all suppo
This might be interesting. I've set up Actions builds for extensions,
and the Windows part was pretty easy (thanks to Christoph's action for
setting up a PHP build environment on Windows). If I could set up a
workflow that when I tag a release, it pushes a full matrix to PECL,
that would be great.
With php-src's recently starting to Github Actions, would it be
possible for PECL builds to use Github Actions with Windows. It
supports Windows server 2016, 2019, and even 2022 (IIRC).
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 5:17 PM Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> bad news: the Windows PECL build mach
Hi all,
bad news: the Windows PECL build machine died! Is there anybody
interested in sponsoring a successor? That (virtual) machine would need
to run 24/7, and to be configured to run php/web-rmtools, basically
listening for new PECL releases, and to build them as soon as possible.
It should ru
21 matches
Mail list logo