Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 01.04.2010, at 01:13, Jacob Oettinger wrote:
Is this a good idea?
Is it silly to have someone, that has not been involved in the earlier unicode
discussions, trying to summarize on them?
I think it cannot really hurt. Ideally whatever you are summarizing should b
On 01.04.2010, at 01:13, Jacob Oettinger wrote:
> Is this a good idea?
> Is it silly to have someone, that has not been involved in the earlier
> unicode discussions, trying to summarize on them?
I think it cannot really hurt. Ideally whatever you are summarizing should be
supported by links
Hi
David Zülke kindly let me know that I mis-posted the message below by posting
it as a reply with a different subject. So here it is again, now in its own
thread. (sorry about the double post)
Hi all,
I have been following the internals list since I heard that the unicode effort
had grinded t
Hi all,
I have been following the internals list since I heard that the unicode effort
had grinded to a halt (so I am quite the noob into the php internals world).
I have some ideas for possible ways to implement unicode handling. My guess is
that most of these have been discussed earlier but I
