Daniel Convissor wrote:
"running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported at http://www.phpbb.com.";
Of course, that's because they're too lazy to make it work under PHP 5,
let alone be secure in the first place.
Of cause this has nothing to do with Apache2 issues, but phpbb like a
lot of very popu
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 02:14:31AM +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> "running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported at http://www.phpbb.com.";
Of course, that's because they're too lazy to make it work under PHP 5,
let alone be secure in the first place.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D
At 06:46 PM 12/22/2004 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The changes should trickle out with the next manual build. I don't think
it was a big deal before, and making a big deal of it now probably doesn't
help anybody. It's not like we suddenly fixed a bunch of things in the
apache2handler sapi and we
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Thanks. Where is the change made? Do you guys want to post some statement
> on php.net to clarify things? I think keeping a warm fuzzy relationship
> with ASF is important and both projects have always been very close and
> supportive one another.
I made
At 10:06 AM 12/22/2004 -0500, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
I've got to say that I have seen quite a few very heavily loaded sites
using Apache 2 pre-fork and PHP. Although we have had a few bugs in the
past few months in the Apache 2 SAPI I think it's quite stable today, and
som
