On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 02:12 PM, Clint Priest wrote:
>> Unfortunately my experience with that process has been that many people
>> will vote who had no part in the discussion.
>
> I don't see a point repeating points of discussion when being in
> ag
On 03/17/2013 02:12 PM, Clint Priest wrote:
> Unfortunately my experience with that process has been that many people
> will vote who had no part in the discussion.
I don't see a point repeating points of discussion when being in
agreement with people who already stated their opinion, or being
per
Unfortunately my experience with that process has been that many people
will vote who had no part in the discussion.
On 3/16/2013 3:16 PM, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Sébastien Durand wrote:
Hi guys,
*I think it could be a nice little improvement to add an extra f
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Sébastien Durand wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> *I think it could be a nice little improvement to add an extra form field
> (*160
> chars max),* that would let users quickly comment on why they voted "yes"
> or "no".*
> *
> *
> *It would help having a better sense of what'
Hi guys,
*I think it could be a nice little improvement to add an extra form field (*160
chars max),* that would let users quickly comment on why they voted "yes"
or "no".*
*
*
*It would help having a better sense of what's going on and** to understand
why this proposed feature is a good language
