Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
"on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS"
I disagree with that part of your comment.
More people are already using git and are not open to changing so the
discussion was rather one sided. :( Tod
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> "on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS"
>> I disagree with that part of your comment.
>
> More people are already using git and are not open to changing so the
> discussion was rather one sided. :( Today that is
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
"on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS"
I disagree with that part of your comment.
More people are already using git and are not open to changing so the discussion
was rather one sided. :( Today that is probably the right choice and does not
bother me since hg just w
hi.
"on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS"
I disagree with that part of your comment.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> While the stable door has already been slammed shut, I think this will be of
> interest to other developers ...
> http://www.ericsink.com/vcbe/index.h
While the stable door has already been slammed shut, I think this will be of
interest to other developers ...
http://www.ericsink.com/vcbe/index.html
Many of the points made have a direct bearing on the rather one sided discussion
on DVCS and the best practice seciton of the book is well worth