Derick Rethans wrote:
AFAIK you were asked to send a patch instead... and not totally new
files.
http://sheep.deev.com/~olivier/patch.txt
I won't send it here (375KB), but this is the unified diff between two
source dirs.
This time, please inform me if the format is not valid.
Some files are c
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Olivier Hill wrote:
> I've submitted a patch (tar file) containing various new .dsp/.dsw
> fixing all those kind of things...
>
> Never got a reply.
AFAIK you were asked to send a patch instead... and not totally new
files.
regards,
Derick
--
"Interpreting what the GPL
Philip Olson wrote:
And here's one more:
- Rename various DLL's as PHP5 and not PHP4. Example, have
php5apache.dll instead of php4apache.dll for PHP 5.
Regards,
Philip
I've submitted a patch (tar file) containing various new .dsp/.dsw
fixing all those kind of things...
Never got a reply.
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
[snip]
And here's one more:
- Rename various DLL's as PHP5 and not PHP4. Example, have
php5apache.dll instead of php4apache.dll for PHP 5.
Regards,
Phil
At 21:20 20/07/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello Zeev,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>- Add support for 'this::()', 'this::'
ZS> ?
ZS> That's what you have self:: for.
>> and 'new this()'
>> inside static methods.
ZS> I see no compelling reason to add 'new this()', but either
Hello Zeev,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>- Include SPL forach hooking into the engine.
>> Renaming the files to 'Zend_whatever' doesn't really make a difference.
>> Maybe the patch is a bit lengthy but the biggest part of it is a function
>> that allows to very effectivel
Hello Zeev,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>- Complete work on exceptions and find a solution on when to throw exceptions
>> and when to use errors.
>>
>> I still do not see any BC problems with making try/catch blocks to convert
>> E_WARING, E_NOTICE & E_ERROR to exceptions
Hello Andi,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 9:29:56 PM, you wrote:
AG> At 08:20 PM 20/7/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote:
>>Hello Zeev,
>>
>>Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> >>- Add support for 'this::()', 'this::'
>>
>>ZS> ?
>>ZS> That's what you have self:: for.
>>
>> >> and 'new this
At 08:20 PM 20/7/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello Zeev,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>- Add support for 'this::()', 'this::'
ZS> ?
ZS> That's what you have self:: for.
>> and 'new this()'
>> inside static methods.
ZS> I see no compelling reason to add 'new this()', but
Hello Zeev,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:
>>- Add support for 'this::()', 'this::'
ZS> ?
ZS> That's what you have self:: for.
>> and 'new this()'
>> inside static methods.
ZS> I see no compelling reason to add 'new this()', but either way, if we do
ZS> find such a reason, i
At 16:44 20/07/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello everyone,
here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
I think we can live with many of these remaining until after beta 2. As
long as we fix plenty of things (which we have), I think we should try to
aim for another beta
Hello George,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 5:50:52 PM, you wrote:
GS> On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 11:45 AM, Marcus BXrger wrote:
>> As i said combining both thechniques makes no sense and converting the
>> error
>> mechanisms of old code when preparing new things shouldn't be a
>> problem at all
>
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 11:45 AM, Marcus BXrger wrote:
As i said combining both thechniques makes no sense and converting the
error
mechanisms of old code when preparing new things shouldn't be a
problem at all
since you have to change several things already without the exception
issue.
I
Hello George,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 5:30:43 PM, you wrote:
>> - Completely force a derived class now to implement the same amount of
>> parameters with the same typehints as the inherited one. When it comes
>> to typehints theory allows to provide same or parent types but that would
>> be
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 11:33 AM, Timm Friebe wrote:
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:44, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello everyone,
here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
+ Finalize and fix the Reflection API by applying this patch:
http://sitten-polizei.de/php/reflection
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:44, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
+ Finalize and fix the Reflection API by applying this patch:
http://sitten-polizei.de/php/reflection_api/zend_reflection_api.c.diff
For details, have a
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 09:44 AM, Marcus BXrger wrote:
Hello everyone,
here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
High priority:
- Completely force a derived class now to implement the same amount of
parameters with the same typehints as the inherited one. Wh
You forgot these:
http://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_for=&boolean=0&limit=All&order_by=id&direction=DESC&cmd=display&status=Open&php_os=&phpver=5&assign=&author_email=&bug_age=0
--Jani
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Marcus Bö rger wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>here is an updated
Hello everyone,
here is an updated list of things we need to do/discuss before beta 2.
High priority:
- Completely force a derived class now to implement the same amount of
parameters with the same typehints as the inherited one. When it comes
to typehints theory allows to provide same or
19 matches
Mail list logo
