On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 05:04, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Go ahead with it.
> Please commit it.
> I hope Sascha will relax with another one of his holy wars.
Done.
--
-=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-
John Coggeshall http://www.coggeshall.org/
The PHP Develo
Go ahead with it.
Please commit it.
I hope Sascha will relax with another one of his holy wars.
Andi
At 03:00 AM 1/21/2004 -0500, John Coggeshall wrote:
Alright..
I've got a patch sitting here on my laptop that converts all of the OO
syntax in the tidy extension into studlyCaps. I.e.
$tid
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:00:39AM -0500, John Coggeshall wrote:
> Although my *personal* preference here is to maintain the current use of
> underscores (since it is consistent with the procedural API).. as far as
> PHP 5 goes itself I don't really have an opinion. I'm willing to apply
> this pat
> PHP 5 goes itself I don't really have an opinion. I'm willing to apply
> this patch, but before I do can I please get a +1 -1 vote on this?
-1
There really is no reason to convert existing code.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visi
Hello John,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 9:00:39 AM, you wrote:
> Alright..
> I've got a patch sitting here on my laptop that converts all of the OO
> syntax in the tidy extension into studlyCaps. I.e.
> $tidy = tidy_parse_file();
> or
> $tidy = new tidy();
>
Alright..
I've got a patch sitting here on my laptop that converts all of the OO
syntax in the tidy extension into studlyCaps. I.e.
$tidy = tidy_parse_file();
or
$tidy = new tidy();
$tidy->parse_file();
Will become..
$tidy = tidy_parse_f
