Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> ArrayObject extends the handler responsible for giving you such
> information. So it might very well be a bug.
>
> You should report it!
>
> Best,
Thanks Etienne, I went ahead and made a bug report and patch here:
http
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 20:54, Chris Stockton wrote:
> I was curious if this behavior was expected, it caught me by surprise.
> A base object I use extends ArrayObject, that class is extended
> heavily throughout my code and I recently wanted to use
> get_object_vars, but noticed it return
I was curious if this behavior was expected, it caught me by surprise.
A base object I use extends ArrayObject, that class is extended
heavily throughout my code and I recently wanted to use
get_object_vars, but noticed it returning an empty array. I do not
expect get_object_vars to return the prop
