Hi Stan,
I don't really know which implementation is preferrable.
I just dropped the idea here first. Once decided, I can write a detailed RFC.
With some initial help, I can work on the patch to support it. I'm not
expert in internals, so some help will be surely needed.
I'm totally opened to su
Hi!
1- A class that implements ArrayAccess must be useable everywhere an
"array" is useable;
The problem is that many functions dealing with arrays do not make sense
with generic object. For others, it may make sense in theory, but not be
practical - e.g., suppose you have ArrayAccess object
Hi,
I like this idea very much, too but I do see the problems in doing it
correctly.
From my point of view the problem looks as follows:
PHP arrays are a wonderful universal construct but it is problematic
to use them in scenarios where you dont want to bind directly to the
single, avail
Until now I tried to find the easiest possible solution.
Currently we have two paths to chose:
1- A class that implements ArrayAccess must be useable everywhere an
"array" is useable;
2- ArrayAccess needs to be expanded with methods for all the array
functions and ArrayObject needs to implement th
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:42 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> I'm trying to avoid a "globally solution" on first instance to avoid a
> great impact on language.
> If you wanna ask me what's the global solution, I'll suggest a
> Collection like implementation for all array functions.
Define "all arr
2009/7/30 Alexey Zakhlestin
> 2009/7/30 Johannes Schlüter :
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> >> What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> >> instances in array_* functions?
> >> If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
I'm trying to avoid a "globally solution" on first instance to avoid a
great impact on language.
If you wanna ask me what's the global solution, I'll suggest a
Collection like implementation for all array functions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collection_%28computing%29
http://trac.doctrine-proje
2009/7/30 Johannes Schlüter :
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
>> What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
>> instances in array_* functions?
>> If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
>> patch, but I need some initial guida
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> instances in array_* functions?
> If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
> patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
> f
2009/7/30 David Coallier
> >
> > What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> > instances in array_* functions?
> > If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
> > patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
> > function.
> >
>
> I
>
> What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> instances in array_* functions?
> If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
> patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
> function.
>
I think it's a marvelous idea :)
I'm attachi
Hi guys,
What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
instances in array_* functions?
If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
function.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer
C
12 matches
Mail list logo
