On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 um 10:04 schrieb Pierre Joye:
>> ext/hash can have it anyway. I did not look at it if it makes sense to
>> use it in other parts.
>
> Sorry for not bein more clear: yes, I was thinking about adding it to
> ext/hash, of co
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 10:07 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 um 10:04 schrieb Pierre Joye:
> > ext/hash can have it anyway. I did not look at it if it makes sense to
> > use it in other parts.
>
> Sorry for not bein more clear: yes, I was thinking about adding it to
> ext/hash, o
Am 28.08.2014 um 10:04 schrieb Pierre Joye:
> ext/hash can have it anyway. I did not look at it if it makes sense to
> use it in other parts.
Sorry for not bein more clear: yes, I was thinking about adding it to
ext/hash, of course. It might make sense, though, to evaluate whether
it can also b
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I recently came across SipHash [1] (which is "a family of pseudorandom
> functions (a.k.a. keyed hash functions) optimized for speed on short
> messages") and am wondering whether it would make sense to add support
> for it to PHP.
I recently came across SipHash [1] (which is "a family of pseudorandom
functions (a.k.a. keyed hash functions) optimized for speed on short
messages") and am wondering whether it would make sense to add support
for it to PHP.
Thoughts?
--
[1] https://131002.net/siphash/
--
PHP Internals
