At 05:21 PM 7/7/2005 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I'd like to take a step back and try and understand better in which
> cases we are failing. Although I know we added critical section code in
> the hash, I think it's effectiveness is questionable, because I believe
> there a
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I'd like to take a step back and try and understand better in which
> cases we are failing. Although I know we added critical section code in
> the hash, I think it's effectiveness is questionable, because I believe
> there are many places today where we might have critical se
I'd like to take a step back and try and understand better in which cases
we are failing. Although I know we added critical section code in the hash,
I think it's effectiveness is questionable, because I believe there are
many places today where we might have critical sections besides the hash
Currently we have some issues when it comes to dealing with signals. We
have a number of critical sections in the engine and in various
extensions that rely on the HANDLE_BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS macro in an
attempt to not be interrupted. However, the actual signal blocking is
supplied by the current
