Hello,
On 1/15/07, Sara Golemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I told you, there was already a consensus on this solution, check
> my initial proposal (solution #2):
>
> http://news.php.net/php.internals/26965
>
No, that's a consensus on compile-time versus runtime. What I offered
in my post
I like Option 4.
-Andrei
On Jan 14, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
Option 4:
Include fetchtype and subelement during runtime JIT callback
allowing JIT callback to only do work necessary to prepare for the
read/write call being performed.
e.g.
int php_example_jit_callback(int str_
As I told you, there was already a consensus on this solution, check
my initial proposal (solution #2):
http://news.php.net/php.internals/26965
No, that's a consensus on compile-time versus runtime. What I offered
in my post was four variants of how runtime could be implemented.
In respons
Hello Sara,
On 1/15/07, Sara Golemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For reasons best left on IRC, it looks like I'll be working on runtime
JIT. To that end, I've come up with a few proposals of varying
complexity and feature-set completeness:
Option 1:
Dump support for compile-time JIT and replace
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hi Sara,
>
> Sorry but I wasn't on IRC so I don't quite understand what you're trying to
> accomplish ;)
> Can you please explain? Once I understand what you're trying to accomplish
> I'll be more than happy to provide feedback to the
> options list.
Andrei/Pierre have a d
Sara Golemon wrote:
> For reasons best left on IRC, it looks like I'll be working on runtime
> JIT. To that end, I've come up with a few proposals of varying
> complexity and feature-set completeness:
>
> Option 1:
> Dump support for compile-time JIT and replace it with a call at runtime
> using
Original Message-
> From: Sara Golemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 8:25 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Runtime JIT Proposals
>
> For reasons best left on IRC, it looks like I'll be working
> on runtime JIT. To tha
For reasons best left on IRC, it looks like I'll be working on runtime
JIT. To that end, I've come up with a few proposals of varying
complexity and feature-set completeness:
Option 1:
Dump support for compile-time JIT and replace it with a call at runtime
using the same semantics.
Advantag
