Hi,
2008/11/3 Pierre Joye
> hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:16 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
> >>>
> >>> Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
> >>> working on QA and remov
hi,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Ronald Chmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:16 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
>>>
>>> Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
>>> working on QA and removing the names who haven't be
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:16 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
working on QA and removing the names who haven't been around for
years
(I don't even recognized most of those names)?
How do you recommend
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 18:57, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 14:54 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> I'm not sure I like the idea of a strong credits page, it creates ego
>> related issues which are not helping. A general page with the list of
>> the QA contributor
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 14:54 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I'm not sure I like the idea of a strong credits page, it creates ego
> related issues which are not helping. A general page with the list of
> the QA contributors or coordinators (@Zoe, dictactor-like ;) would be
> better and more flexible.
hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My end-goal here is to face the facts: Quality assurance is about
> testing, providing builds for people to test on, look into bugs and
> everything along those lines.
> snaps.php.net, downloads.php.net/~randomguy2
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 14:54, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's about Sanjay Mantoor, Feliix dV or all the other test fest
> attendees continuing their work after the end of the test fest?
Sure, after having "proven themselves" to be worth it for some period
of time, not like the on
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 13:16, Sebastian Bergmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
working on QA and removing the names who haven't been around for years
(I don't even recognized most
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 13:16, Sebastian Bergmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
>>> Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
>>> working on QA and removing the names
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 13:16, Sebastian Bergmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
>> Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
>> working on QA and removing the names who haven't been around for years
>> (I don't even recognized most of those names)?
Hannes Magnusson schrieb:
> Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
> working on QA and removing the names who haven't been around for years
> (I don't even recognized most of those names)?
How do you recommend measuring who deserves credit?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 20:01, Kalle Sommer Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes patches for the actually extension is normally sent to internals
> and test patches are sent to QA people.
Speaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually
working on QA and removing the names w
12 matches
Mail list logo
