Antony Dovgal wrote:
I tend to disagree with you here, Edin.
Releasing one RC just after another - _that_ would be bad management.
RCs are RCs, if something is broken in one of them, let's wait for the
next one and see if it ok.
Also, I don't like the rush in the release management which to a
On 10/08/2006 04:26 AM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no
point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to
release things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no
point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to
release things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow
people some time t
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no point
in waiting for another week for it just because we have to release
things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow
people some time to test it, and if nothi
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no point
in waiting for another week for it just because we have to release
things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow
people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, re
