RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-16 Thread Jared Williams
> On May 13, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: > > > hehe, maybe confused with delphi or borlands c++ > additons? Speaking > > of which before we add 'readonly' we should go for full property > > support but on the other hand that might be a little bit too much > > until php is used

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-14 Thread Ron Korving
Likely Delphi yeah :) Ron "Marcus Boerger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello Ron, > > hehe, maybe confused with delphi or borlands c++ additons? Speaking of > which before we add 'readonly' we should go for full property support but > on the other hand that m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-13 Thread Jeff Moore
On May 13, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: hehe, maybe confused with delphi or borlands c++ additons? Speaking of which before we add 'readonly' we should go for full property support but on the other hand that might be a little bit too much until php is used with code generators an

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-13 Thread Mauro Nicolás Infantino
Marcus, Just my two cents... Maybe it's better to see it the other way round. Maybe php won't be used with code generators and gui designers until full property support is developed. Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Ron, > > hehe, maybe confused with delphi or borlands c++ additons? > Speaking o

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-13 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Ron, hehe, maybe confused with delphi or borlands c++ additons? Speaking of which before we add 'readonly' we should go for full property support but on the other hand that might be a little bit too much until php is used with code generators and gui designers where code inspectors execute

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-13 Thread Ron Korving
My bad, you are absolutely right, I must be confused with another language, but I wonder which one odd. Ron "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ron Korving wrote: > > In C++ you'd use private for this. All object members are readable, ... > > Co

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-13 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Ron Korving wrote: In C++ you'd use private for this. All object members are readable, ... Could you elaborate on this? -- Hartmut Holzgraefe, Senior Support Engineer. MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Are you certified? http://www.mysql.com/training/certification -- PHP In

[PHP-DEV] Re: private, protected, readonly, public

2006-05-12 Thread Ron Korving
In C++ you'd use private for this. All object members are readable, but modifyability depends on the relation between the caller and the object. I don't quite understand why PHP is doing it differently. - Ron "Jason Garber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello