No.
http://www.unicode.org/faq/basic_q.html#23
-Andrei
On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:29 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:
And isn't UTF16 === UCS2 ?
--Wez.
On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm, don't we use UC
Just my $0.02,
for the MS compilers wchar_t is 2 bytes while for gcc it is 4.
Andrey
Wez Furlong wrote:
"the fundamental representation of text in Windows NT-based operating
systems is UTF-16, and the WCHAR data type is a UTF-16 code unit"
So, it looks like we don't need to do anything speci
"the fundamental representation of text in Windows NT-based operating
systems is UTF-16, and the WCHAR data type is a UTF-16 code unit"
So, it looks like we don't need to do anything special.
--Wez.
On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wez,
>
> UCS2 is limited to the repre
Wez,
UCS2 is limited to the representing characters within the BMP ( 1 code-unit
== 1 code-point)
UTF16 uses surrogates to address characters beyond the BMP (so a code-point
may be represented by 2 code-units)
clayton
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.unicode.org/faq/basic_q.html#23
> -Original Message-
> From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 10:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: php-src /ext/com_dot
And isn't UTF16 === UCS2 ?
--Wez.
On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Umm, don't we use UCS2 internally?
>
> actually ICU is UTF16...
>
> l0t3k
>
>
> --Wez.
>
> On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm, don't we use UCS2 internally?
actually ICU is UTF16...
l0t3k
--Wez.
On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wez,
>
> > + case IS_UNICODE:
> > + V_VT(v) = VT_BSTR;
> > + V_BSTR(v) = SysAllocString
Umm, don't we use UCS2 internally?
--Wez.
On 8/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wez,
>
> > + case IS_UNICODE:
> > + V_VT(v) = VT_BSTR;
> > + V_BSTR(v) = SysAllocString(Z_USTRVAL_P(z));
> > + break;
>
> my understanding is that Win32 uses UCS2, so do we need to account for
>
Wez,
> + case IS_UNICODE:
> + V_VT(v) = VT_BSTR;
> + V_BSTR(v) = SysAllocString(Z_USTRVAL_P(z));
> + break;
my understanding is that Win32 uses UCS2, so do we need to account for
surrogates ?
l0t3k
""Wez Furlong"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wez Sat Aug 13 15:
