On 19/12/2019 12:51, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 20.11.2018 at 11:26, Rowan Collins wrote:
It seems to me that *neither* extension is properly maintained right now
(the with-a-d extension has recent releases, but all wrapping an abandoned
upstream library); so if the without-a-d extension has
On 20.11.2018 at 11:26, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 15:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 12:00 AM AllenJB >
>>> Someone was asking about memcache vs memached on IRC the other day and I
>>> advised them the memcache extension looked abandoned based on the PECL
>>>
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 15:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 12:00 AM AllenJB
> > Someone was asking about memcache vs memached on IRC the other day and I
> > advised them the memcache extension looked abandoned based on the PECL
> > page. Having 2 such similar extensions is confusin
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 12:00 AM AllenJB Someone was asking about memcache vs memached on IRC the other day and I
> advised them the memcache extension looked abandoned based on the PECL
> page. Having 2 such similar extensions is confusing - It would also be
> nice if someone could document the maj
Someone was asking about memcache vs memached on IRC the other day and I
advised them the memcache extension looked abandoned based on the PECL
page. Having 2 such similar extensions is confusing - It would also be
nice if someone could document the major differences between the 2
extensions so
Rowan Collins in php.internals (Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:40:27 +0100):
>However, it seems that the package without a d is actually abandoned.
>The official PECL package was last released more than 5 years ago [3],
>and the bug asking for PHP 7 compatibility is still open [4]. An
>unofficial fork appa
