On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> > text_to_array($s) == str_split($s, 1)
>
> No, because str_split always splits into 1 byte chunks. text_to_array
> would take the character set into account (or that's where the utility
> in it would be)...
No, as PHP currently does *NOT* know abou
Hi!
On 6/21/11 1:23 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
2011/6/21 Robert Eisele mailto:rob...@xarg.org>>
And what actually failed? The idea seams straightforward.
Robert
http://www.slideshare.net/andreizm/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-what-happened-to-unicode-and-php-6
Also you may want to r
2011/6/21 Robert Eisele
> And what actually failed? The idea seams straightforward.
>
> Robert
>
>
http://www.slideshare.net/andreizm/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-what-happened-to-unicode-and-php-6
to my understanding: in retrospective the utf-16 wasn't the best idea, it
caused more conversion
And what actually failed? The idea seams straightforward.
Robert
2011/6/20 Johannes Schlüter
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 20:38 +0200, Robert Eisele wrote:
> > I really like the ideas shared here. It's a thing of consideration that
> > array-functions should also work with strings. Maybe this would
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 20:38 +0200, Robert Eisele wrote:
> I really like the ideas shared here. It's a thing of consideration that
> array-functions should also work with strings. Maybe this would be the way
> to go, but I'm more excited about the OOP implementation of TextIterator and
> ByteIterato
2011.06.20 21:38 Robert Eisele rašė:
> I really like the ideas shared here. It's a thing of consideration that
> array-functions should also work with strings. Maybe this would be the way
> to go, but I'm more excited about the OOP implementation of TextIterator
> and
> ByteIterator, which solves t
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
>
> > text_to_array($s) == str_split($s, 1)
>
> No, because str_split always splits into 1 byte chunks. text_to_array
> would take the character set into account (or that's where the utility
> in it would be)...
I really like the ideas shared here. It's a thing of consideration that
array-functions should also work with strings. Maybe this would be the way
to go, but I'm more excited about the OOP implementation of TextIterator and
ByteIterator, which solves the whole problem at once (and is easier to
impl
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:06 -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 6/20/11 9:57 AM, Todd Ruth wrote:
> > Iterators are nice. Having a "text_string_to_array" function
> > would also be fine. For example:
> >
> > $s = 'hello';
> > foreach (text_string_to_array($s) as $x) {
> > var_dump($x);
> text_to_array($s) == str_split($s, 1)
No, because str_split always splits into 1 byte chunks. text_to_array
would take the character set into account (or that's where the utility
in it would be)...
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 6/20/11 9:57 AM, Todd Ruth
Hi!
On 6/20/11 9:57 AM, Todd Ruth wrote:
Iterators are nice. Having a "text_string_to_array" function
would also be fine. For example:
$s = 'hello';
foreach (text_string_to_array($s) as $x) {
var_dump($x);
}
text_to_array($s) == str_split($s, 1)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Archit
Adding to John Crenshaw's list of reasons not to implicitly
treat strings as arrays in foreach loops... Please keep in
mind the following valid code:
$s = 'hello';
foreach ((array)$s as $x) {
var_dump($x);
}
The result is:
string(5) "hello"
That behavior can be handy. Hopefully, a BC break
12 matches
Mail list logo
