On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 23 September 2010 21:39, Arvids Godjuks wrote:
>> I think leave both ways, because it's really much of the code uses actually
>> {4} rather than [4] for strings.
>> But please do the substr functionality as it was suggested a few years
>> be
On 23 September 2010 21:39, Arvids Godjuks wrote:
> I think leave both ways, because it's really much of the code uses actually
> {4} rather than [4] for strings.
> But please do the substr functionality as it was suggested a few years
> before. That makes perfect sense :)
>
Are there any further
I think leave both ways, because it's really much of the code uses actually
{4} rather than [4] for strings.
But please do the substr functionality as it was suggested a few years
before. That makes perfect sense :)
On 22/09/10 22:34, Philip Olson wrote:
Greetings geeks,
This topic still lacks a defined conclusion. There are several rumors that
something was decided, but I can't confirm this without archived proof. Here's
the code:
$str = "I am an array of characters, but still a string.";
echo $s
On 22/09/10 22:34, Philip Olson wrote:
Greetings geeks,
This topic still lacks a defined conclusion. There are several rumors that
something was decided, but I can't confirm this without archived proof. Here's
the code:
$str = "I am an array of characters, but still a string.";
echo $s
