Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-22 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Antony Dovgal schrieb: >>> We can consider it as a bugfix, IMO the current typehints are >>> "broken". >> Then you should MFH to PHP_5_1, NOW. > Amen. Did we reach a conclusion here? I talked to Derick the other day and he said "maybe" for PHP 5.1.1, but not for PHP 5.1.0 because we're so far a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Jani Taskinen
Sorry for preaching to the choir. --Jani On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Antony Dovgal wrote: On 17.10.2005 00:30, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Jani Taskinen schri

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 17.10.2005 00:30, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Jani Taskinen schrieb: So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will be PHP_5_2 branch then? No, I am proposing t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Jani Taskinen schrieb: > > > > > So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will b

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Jani Taskinen schrieb: So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will be PHP_5_2 branch then? No, I am proposing to have this change in PHP 5.1.1, as it is t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > > > Jani Taskinen schrieb: > > > So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will be PHP_5_2 branch then? > > > > No, I am proposing to have this change in PHP 5.1.1, as it is too late > > to have it in P

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Jani Taskinen schrieb: > So it can't be in a bugfix release. I can wish, right? :-) Too bad we're already this far along in the RC for PHP 5.1.0, Sebastian -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Jani Taskinen schrieb: So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will be PHP_5_2 branch then? No, I am proposing to have this change in PHP 5.1.1, as it is too late to have it in PHP 5.1.0. It's not a bugfix. So it can't be in a bugfix relea

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Jani Taskinen schrieb: > So you're proposing that PHP_5_1 branch will be PHP_5_2 branch then? No, I am proposing to have this change in PHP 5.1.1, as it is too late to have it in PHP 5.1.0. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-16 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Derick Rethans schrieb: derick Sat Oct 15 08:54:20 2005 EDT Modified files: /php-srcNEWS /ZendEngine2zend_compile.c Log: - Changed type hints so that they take "= NULL" as default value. It would be great if t

[PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src NEWS

2005-10-15 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Derick Rethans schrieb: > derickSat Oct 15 08:54:20 2005 EDT > > Modified files: > /php-src NEWS > /ZendEngine2 zend_compile.c > Log: > - Changed type hints so that they take "= NULL" as default value. It would be great if this could be merged