Wez Furlong wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
True. Discussions about whether or not to use a templating system or
using comments for readability is off topic.
However I am trying to find out if there is a technical reason for not
including the alternative syntax for this control structure or any other
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:10:26 +0200, Ferdinand Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:34, Marc Richards wrote:
>
> > It is, and that is what I currently do, but
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Is generally less readable
On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:34, Marc Richards wrote:
> It is, and that is what I currently do, but
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is generally less readable (especially in a large page) than:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
If you want readability, try using comments!
Red Wingate wrote:
Marc Richards wrote:
I guess this is too late for 5.0, and I feel like there is bound to be
opposition, but this has been bugging me for a while, so I figured I
would ask.
I use the alternative syntax for control structures almost exclusively
within my HTML code but I have to r
Thomas Seifert wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:53:51 -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
This looks like a good case to use a real template-engine.
Huh? Why would you use a template engine if the features you are
looking for already exist in the language. You think I should use a
temp
Marc Richards wrote:
> I guess this is too late for 5.0, and I feel like there is bound to be
> opposition, but this has been bugging me for a while, so I figured I
> would ask.
>
> I use the alternative syntax for control structures almost exclusively
> within my HTML code but I have to revert t
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:53:51 -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This looks like a good case to use a real template-engine.
thomas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
