On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
> > Yup :)
> >
> > "cvs co php5" instead of "cvs co php4", that will checkout ZendEngine2
> > instead of ZE 1.
>
> Does it then make sense to have messages like this,
> "Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/imap php_imap.c" from CVS??
> or see all things
> Does it then make sense to have messages like this,
> "Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/imap php_imap.c" from
> CVS?? or see all things of cvs related to php4.
>
I'm in the middle of 'fixing' this.
-- james
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:10 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Which branch should it be then?? Just head seems not to compile at
all which is then in my opinion useless.
HEAD compiles fine, w
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
> On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >>
> >> Which branch should it be then?? Just head seems not to compile at
> >> all which is then in my opinion useless.
> >
> > HEAD compiles fine, what are you talking about?
>
> See b
