Hello Ditesh,
there are indeed. Both allow to compress the Phar entries. Personally I
prefer bz2 but as said earlier that only wroks with CVS code right now.
marcus
Friday, January 25, 2008, 4:48:57 PM, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 09:14 -0800, chris# wrote:
>> I can't help but notice th
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 09:14 -0800, chris# wrote:
> I can't help but notice the defaults for gzip, and bzip is disabled.
I'm the port submitter/maintainer for pecl-phar. If there are good
reasons to have gzip/bzip2 support enabled by default, I'll be happy to
rectify the Makefile ASAP.
Cheers and
Hello chris,
there is no stability issue with gz and 5.2.6 will fix the last issue with
bz2/phar interaction. The actual reason for both being off is that they
reside in pecl and the assumption is that pecl modules are not present by
default. Simply add those two extensions and build again.
mar
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:56:32 -0600, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Barrow wrote:
>> PHP has ZIP, GZip, and BZ2 support, but nothing for tar archives. Is
>> anyone interested in working on a tar extension?
>
> FYI, pecl/phar has full tar support plus tar.gz/tar.bz in the
> soon-to-be
Sam Barrow wrote:
PHP has ZIP, GZip, and BZ2 support, but nothing for tar archives. Is
anyone interested in working on a tar extension?
FYI, pecl/phar has full tar support plus tar.gz/tar.bz in the
soon-to-be-released 2.0.0 version. Development on tar features has
stabilized, I'm focusing on
