Hi Steph
2008/10/18 Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> That wouldn't be the right thread to discuss the merits of a solution,
>> anyway. This thread is about the tally, and I'm trying to interpret
>> it.
>
> I did actually keep tabs on this. Yes the choice of separator played a part
> for many. How
Josh, please...
What I'm wondering is how many of those "many" voted for or against a
proposition for the wrong reason. For instance, how many users
understood that 2 is not about the use of triple colon? If someone
disregarded 2 because of the triple colon then it was a mistake, as
the triple c
2008/10/18 Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I did actually keep tabs on this. Yes the choice of separator played a part
> for many. However there were just as many who were happy with it - and the
> same would have applied whatever separator was used.
What I'm wondering is how many of those "many"
That wouldn't be the right thread to discuss the merits of a solution,
anyway. This thread is about the tally, and I'm trying to interpret
it.
I did actually keep tabs on this. Yes the choice of separator played a part
for many. However there were just as many who were happy with it - and the
Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 9:41 PM
> To: Daniel Brown
> Cc: Keryx Web; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
>
> 2008/10/18 Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Dav
2008/10/18 Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in
>>> both suggestions.
>>
>> Is that why you voted for 3? B
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in
>> both suggestions.
>
> Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read?
Is that
2008/10/18 Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in
> both suggestions.
Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read?
JD
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http:/
Steph Fox skrev:
Would anyone still planning to vote please include a *brief* explanation
of why they're making the choices they're making?
OK. I'm in favour of number 3.
My main involvement with PHP is teaching it. I spend an endless amount
of time tracking down misplaced or omitted semi-col
2008/10/17 Mike Willbanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. #3 - it is much cleaner to read than the other implementations in
> resolving the conflict. a different separator will be much harder to simply
> see from a comparison.
I beg to differ. A different separator (namespace scope resolution
operator)
1. #3 - it is much cleaner to read than the other implementations in
resolving the conflict. a different separator will be much harder to simply
see from a comparison. in a state where many people are in fact doing code
reviews and as it gets larger into big business the easier to read is going
t
Hi Stas,
So far, my proposals hardly got any hearing at all, fair or otherwise -
they were totally ignored on the vote - never even mentioned except for
the note in Greg's wiki (which, despite being incorrect, was never fixed
or changed), and it looks like at least some of the persons were und
Hi!
cut-and-dried answer by tonight or forget it. Then it was pointed out to
me that Stas' proposal wasn't getting a fair hearing. Then it turned out
So far, my proposals hardly got any hearing at all, fair or otherwise -
they were totally ignored on the vote - never even mentioned except fo
Seems everyone is going for #3 ... I'm with the crowd. +1 on #3.
OK, this isn't a good reason. Please try to treat this poll with some
seriousness.
The voting patterns became skewed from here on, so the poll's still 5 votes
away from completion because I can't sanely use wildcard votes.
Wo
th; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now.
> > Would it make sense to create an OFFICIAL voting thread and *only*
> > count new votes posted to
Hi Daniel,
There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now.
Would it make sense to create an OFFICIAL voting thread and *only*
count new votes posted to that thread from now until the fifty-vote
mark? Otherwise it seems that it introduces more confusion into an
already loaded iss
My vote is for option #3 and for Gregs proposal too.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Chris Stockton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show
>> us where people generally are coming from.
There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now.
Would it make sense to create
I would like to vote for #3.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> We are not ready yet. So for now I will not force a decision just yet.
>> Hopefully next week ...
>>
>
> I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show
Hi Lukas,
We are not ready yet. So for now I will not force a decision just yet.
Hopefully next week ...
I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show
us where people generally are coming from.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
T
On 17.10.2008, at 04:18, Steph Fox wrote:
just wondering if there are any cut of dates for the tally dates /
rounds etc?
When this tally started out, I'd been told that there had to be a
cut-and-dried answer by tonight or forget it.
We are not ready yet. So for now I will not force a dec
just wondering if there are any cut of dates for the tally dates / rounds
etc?
When this tally started out, I'd been told that there had to be a
cut-and-dried answer by tonight or forget it. Then it was pointed out to me
that Stas' proposal wasn't getting a fair hearing. Then it turned out tha
Steph Fox wrote:
I was hoping to have at least 30 respondees at this stage, but actually
have 29 (and that includes Hannes' abstention). However, to keep y'all
up to date, here's where we're up to with Greg's proposals.
Option #3 is in the lead, but that lead is still pretty fragile; there
ar
23 matches
Mail list logo
