Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: SOAP's ctor's and __call

2004-09-10 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Dmitry, Friday, September 10, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote: > Hi Marcus, > I looked into you ctor's patch and found that it breaks some tests (For > example: ext/soap/tests/transport001.phpt) > I didn't understand what is wrong. :( > I will not apply it now. Well then let's hope MySQLi an

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: SOAP's ctor's and __call

2004-09-10 Thread Dmitry Stogov
receiving. Thanks. Dmitry. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 21:01 > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: Dmitry Stogov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: SOAP's ctor's > > > He

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: SOAP's ctor's

2004-09-09 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Dmitry, Thursday, September 9, 2004, 6:26:42 PM, you wrote: > Hi Marcus, > May be your patch make sense. > But what is the difference between SoapServer::SaopServer and > SoapServer::__construct? > For me, they are equivalent. __construct is the PHP 5 way whereas using the class name (PHP

[PHP-DEV] RE: SOAP's ctor's

2004-09-09 Thread Dmitry Stogov
Hi Marcus, May be your patch make sense. But what is the difference between SoapServer::SaopServer and SoapServer::__construct? For me, they are equivalent. Thanks. Dmitry. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 14:22

[PHP-DEV] Re: SOAP's ctor's

2004-09-09 Thread Ron Korving
Didn't Dmitry fix this a long time ago? My SOAP constructors work fine with __construct() Ron "Marcus Boerger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello Dmitry, > > does anything speak against changing soap's ctor's to > __construct which is the PHP 5 way of doing th