Exactly. Annotations just don't belong there. Short syntax for arrays got
shut a few times but it finally made it to core. I hope native support will
be revisited at some point.
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Stas,
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Stas Malyshev
> >
> wro
Hey everybody,
I've been following this list for a while (1-2 years) and this is the
first message I'm sending.
In my oppinion, annotations in docblocks are a bit(a lot) hacky and
making it even worse by adding them to core is not the best idea.
This is how I think annotations have to look like i
Hi Johannes
2009/5/11 Johannes Schlüter :
> (re-sending, sorry if this arrives twice)
>
> Hi,
>
> This should be low risk as it's a self-contained function and we all est
> HEAD ... but I'd prefer not adding anything but bug fixes to 5.3 as it
> already took way too long.
We can always just merge
(re-sending, sorry if this arrives twice)
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 12:34 +0200, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> 1) ReflectionParameter::getDefaultValue(), was added to HEAD in 2006,
> but never merged to a stable branch? I made a backport of the function
> to 5.3 [1] which I think we should merge,
Jim Wilson wrote:
> 1) Is there a way to inject a method into a Class such that future
> instantiations of that Class will have the method? For example:
>
> 2) Is there a way to change a method which already exists, as in by
> overwriting it with a new function? I'm looking to do the equivalent
