On Tuesday 18 July 2006 12:25, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > Maybe you might not want to include that class until PHP6. Or, how
> > about for backwards compatibility, you do prefix the class name
> > with PHP, but when namespaces come into play, using the php
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Maybe you might not want to include that class until PHP6. Or, how
> about for backwards compatibility, you do prefix the class name with
> PHP, but when namespaces come into play, using the php namespace
> effectively removes the PHP prefix (e.g. PHPD
On 18.07.2006 20:03, Matt Sicker wrote:
It'd be nice to have a php namespace, wouldn't it? ;)
And that would help... how?
Two classes named "Date" will still clash, namespaces won't magically solve it.
Maybe you might not want to include that class until PHP6. Or, how
about for backwards com
On 18-Jul-06, at 12:16 PM, Pierre wrote:
On 7/18/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The date extension functionality can be enabled, but we need to
rename the date class to avoid naming conflicts encountered with PHP
5.1.
Wait, you are suggesting to enable this empty class and re
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 09:27, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> The date extension functionality can be enabled, but we need to
> rename the date class to avoid naming conflicts encountered with PHP
> 5.1. There have been two names under consideration datetime and
> phpdate. Personally I'd prefer datetime
On 18-Jul-06, at 12:16 PM, Pierre wrote:
On 7/18/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The date extension functionality can be enabled, but we need to
rename the date class to avoid naming conflicts encountered with PHP
5.1.
Wait, you are suggesting to enable this empty class and r
On 7/18/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The date extension functionality can be enabled, but we need to
rename the date class to avoid naming conflicts encountered with PHP
5.1.
Wait, you are suggesting to enable this empty class and rename it? And
then he will rename it again f
The date extension functionality can be enabled, but we need to
rename the date class to avoid naming conflicts encountered with PHP
5.1. There have been two names under consideration datetime and
phpdate. Personally I'd prefer datetime, but after doing a quick
search on google that seems l
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:39:18 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Lukas Smith wrote:
>
> > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> > > It's been quite sometime since 5.2 was branched and looking over
> > > our "todo" majority of planned changes were made. Therefor I'd
>
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> > It's been quite sometime since 5.2 was branched and looking over our "todo"
> > majority of planned changes were made. Therefor I'd like to make an RC1 on
> > Thursday next week and start the stabilization cycle of 5.2, so we ca
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:24:26 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:
> Hello Lukas,
>
> Saturday, July 15, 2006, 12:12:12 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >> It's been quite sometime since 5.2 was branched and looking over
> >> our "todo" majority of planned changes were ma
Hello Lukas,
Saturday, July 15, 2006, 12:12:12 PM, you wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> It's been quite sometime since 5.2 was branched and looking over our
>> "todo" majority of planned changes were made. Therefor I'd like to make
>> an RC1 on Thursday next week and start the stabilization
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
It's been quite sometime since 5.2 was branched and looking over our
"todo" majority of planned changes were made. Therefor I'd like to make
an RC1 on Thursday next week and start the stabilization cycle of 5.2,
so we can get a final in about 2 months. Once we start stab
13 matches
Mail list logo
