> From: Christian Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Argh! Reading such a line, I think of named parameters,
> not an array.
>
> That's exactly what we are emulating this way ;-)
> Our patch is greedy, i.e. it collects as much as possible
> into one array. If you want to do this you nee
Richard Quadling wrote:
>> Argh! Reading such a line, I think of named parameters, not an array.
That's exactly what we are emulating this way ;-)
> I agree with Francois here. Other than looking STRONLY like named
> parameters, surely there is a flaw if a declaration is ...
>
> function convert
