ly the way to go.
Thanks,
Ben
== Original ==
From: Dmitry Stogov
To: Benjamin Coutu
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 06:53:20 +0100
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Improvements to array.c code base
Hi Benjamin,
We are in the state, when we mainly have to concentrate on big improvements
that
Hi Benjamin,
We are in the state, when we mainly have to concentrate on big improvements
that we have to deliver till mid of March.
I keep your ideas, but they are stuck at the end of my TODO list.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Coutu
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I was
To: Benjamin Coutu
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:13:04 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Improvements to array.c code base
>
>
>
> Hey:
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Benjamin Coutu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Regarding ARRAY_SLICE(..., preserve_keys=fals
Sorry, your right of course as not preserving keys only applies to numeric
indices.
== Original ==
From: Xinchen Hui
To: Benjamin Coutu
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:13:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Improvements to array.c code base
Hey:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM
rd libraries? Is there some particular drawback? I'd like to
> understand.
hmm, https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fast_zpp :)
thanks
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> == Original ==
> From: Xinchen Hui
> To: Benjamin Coutu
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:53:38 +0100
> Sub
FAST_ZPP: Why is it not used more often, especially in
the satndard libraries? Is there some particular drawback? I'd like to
understand.
Thanks,
Ben
== Original ==
From: Xinchen Hui
To: Benjamin Coutu
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:53:38 +0100
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Improvemen
Hey:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Benjamin Coutu wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I was doing some code review of ext/standard/array.c and have recognized some
> potential for a few performance improvements:
>
> === ARRAY_SLICE(..., preserve_keys=false) ===
>
> array_slice() can always construct a p
