Am 04.04.2015 um 00:13 schrieb Andrea Faulds:
On 3 Apr 2015, at 23:08, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
On Apr 4, 2015 12:34 AM, "Nikita Popov" wrote:
Don't think we need to disable compile-time evaluation for 2) and 3). It'll
just end up being a compile error in that case. I think if you have 1 % 0
> On 3 Apr 2015, at 23:08, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2015 12:34 AM, "Nikita Popov" wrote:
> >
> > Don't think we need to disable compile-time evaluation for 2) and 3). It'll
> > just end up being a compile error in that case. I think if you have 1 % 0
> > occurring in your code liter
On Apr 4, 2015 12:34 AM, "Nikita Popov" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>> >
>>> > May be you'll also suggest something rega
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> >
>> > May be you'll also suggest something regarding bitwise shifts with
>> negative offset?
>> > Allowing negat
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >
> > May be you'll also suggest something regarding bitwise shifts with
> negative offset?
> > Allowing negative offsets using opposite directions would fix
> inconsistency, but I r
Hi,
> On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> May be you'll also suggest something regarding bitwise shifts with negative
> offset?
> Allowing negative offsets using opposite directions would fix inconsistency,
> but I remember, you didn't like it.
> May be keep WARNING (Bit shift by
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >
> > 2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
> offsets. I also propose to change it in the same way (Fatal error at
> compile-time, Exception in
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>>> On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>>
>>> 2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
>>> offsets. I also propose to change it i
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
>> On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>
>> 2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
>> offsets. I also propose to change it in the same way (Fatal error at
>> compile-time, Exception in
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> 1) Division by zero behavior in PHP is really inconsistent.
> It emits WARNING and returns FALLE.
>
> Note, that since PHP-5.6 division by zero may also occur in constant
> expressions. They are compiled and evaluated only once (on first requ
Hi Dmitry,
> On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> 2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
> offsets. I also propose to change it in the same way (Fatal error at
> compile-time, Exception in run-time).
>
> Any thoughts? objections?
For consistency wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
