no.
Dmitry.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > most of the functions converted to FAST_ZPP were collected by profiling
> or
> > real life apps.
> > These functions spent significant part of the time in
> > zend_parse_
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> most of the functions converted to FAST_ZPP were collected by profiling or
> real life apps.
> These functions spent significant part of the time in
> zend_parse_parameters() because they are short themselves or because they
> are called very
most of the functions converted to FAST_ZPP were collected by profiling or
real life apps.
These functions spent significant part of the time in
zend_parse_parameters() because they are short themselves or because they
are called very often.
few functions were added to test some "exotic" type spec
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> It's already done for strlen() - ZEND_STRLEN opcode (and few other
> functions).
> But it make no sense to convert all useful functions into opcodes.
> We need an ability of fast parameter parsing anyway.
Got that, but hard to say for which f
It's already done for strlen() - ZEND_STRLEN opcode (and few other
functions).
But it make no sense to convert all useful functions into opcodes.
We need an ability of fast parameter parsing anyway.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > As I understa
Hi!
> As I understand correctly the only reason we have this discussion is
> the performance impact of zpp with some functions, mainly
> ZEND_FUNCTIONs. What prevents us to make them operators? That may
> break things like call_user_func("strlen", $arg), array_map and the
There's also an issue t
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> I like the idea of having a single syntax for all cases, but I don't like
> the syntax you propose.
> In my opinion, it's syntactically inconsistent, less readable and more
> error prone, than the old one (sscanf based) and the FAST_ZPP one th
I like the idea of having a single syntax for all cases, but I don't like
the syntax you propose.
In my opinion, it's syntactically inconsistent, less readable and more
error prone, than the old one (sscanf based) and the FAST_ZPP one that is
already in php-master.
I would also prefer to have an a
