On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> I just noticed that the DATE_ISO8601 constant and the "c" date()
> character don't give the same results.
> The difference is that the "c" format prints colon in the timezone
> offset, but the constant does not - both are however ISO8601
> compliant.
Hmh. No. The patches weren't attached ;)
On 1/31/06, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just noticed that the DATE_ISO8601 constant and the "c" date()
> character don't give the same results.
> The difference is that the "c" format prints colon in the timezone
> offset, but
