Sure.
At 08:52 AM 5/27/2004 -0700, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I don't think there's a good reason especially as I used zval * for class
> constants. Probably just because it's legacy code and it was never changed.
> I'll try and play around with it right after
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I don't think there's a good reason especially as I used zval * for class
> constants. Probably just because it's legacy code and it was never changed.
> I'll try and play around with it right after 5.0.
Should we add it to something like TODO5.1 so we d
I don't think there's a good reason especially as I used zval * for class
constants. Probably just because it's legacy code and it was never changed.
I'll try and play around with it right after 5.0.
Andi
At 02:04 PM 5/26/2004 -0700, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
This reminds me: why do we have constant
