As another example, anyone with half a brain and more than 10 minutes
experience with the internals of PHP knows that it'd be ridiculous to
suggest that PHP's array type be re-written to act like Java or .NET.
The fact that it is ridiculous is implicit, we all know it, it doesn't
need to be sai
On Nov 7, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
On Nov 6, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
I was shocked and horrified that that ridiculous "remove-the-$"
post actually turned into a legitimate discussion. I mean,
seriously?
No, not seriously.
[snip]
The trick is knowing when a j
Travis Swicegood wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:59 PM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
>
>> 1. All built-in PHP functions should be aliased in the worlds most
>> used languages, so that declaring a "function" could also be written
>> as: "funktsioon", "otstarve", "λειτουργία ", "ویرایش", "Fonction",
>> "funci
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:59 PM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
1. All built-in PHP functions should be aliased in the worlds most
used languages, so that declaring a "function" could also be written
as: "funktsioon", "otstarve", "λειτουργία ",
"ویرایش", "Fonction", "funcionar", "fungsi", "funzionare",
On Nov 6, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
I was shocked and horrified that that ridiculous "remove-the-$"
post actually turned into a legitimate discussion. I mean, seriously?
No, not seriously.
It's an old internet joke, a shibboleth among programmers, not unlike
"GOTO considered h
On 06.11.2008, at 18:46, Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
> NOTE: Continuing from thread "Call it: allow reserved words in a
> class or not?":
[snip]
>
> We can test such automated porting scripts on samples collected from
> PEAR, Google Code and projects like Drupal, Joomla etc. to reduce
> side effec
