2008/3/30, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> list($b) = 'asdf'; // $b is NULL
yep, that does not work, and should IMHO emit the warning I mentioned
in a previuos email... ;)
--
"If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must
be the process of putting them in." – Edsge
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> This is weird... I wouldn't go as far as saying nobody uses it - since
> experience shows there's somebody somewhere using any weird combination
> of PHP features imaginable - but it's definitely a strange code. Even
> though, I think since it's functionality drop, we ma
Em Sex, 2008-03-28 às 12:58 +0100, Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/3/26, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > - Added "jump label" operator (limited "goto"). (Dmitry, Sara)
> > >
> > >
> > > No objection
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Cristian Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/28, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > I agree.
> > Any functionality removal, no matter how wtf it might be, shouldn't be
> merged.
> > If we could however throw E_DEPRECATED there, that would
2008/3/28, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree.
> Any functionality removal, no matter how wtf it might be, shouldn't be
> merged.
> If we could however throw E_DEPRECATED there, that would be great.
I guess an E_WARNING is more appropiate
Warning : "list() only works on numerical
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What exactly does that change?
> >
> > $a = "foo"; list($b) = $a; var_dump($b);
>
> This is weird... I wouldn't go as far as saying nobody uses it - since
> experience shows there's somebody somewhere using any
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/26, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > - Added "jump label" operator (limited "goto"). (Dmitry, Sara)
> >
> >
> > No objection, while it adds yet another keyword.
> >
>
> Patch:
> - http://felipe.ath
What exactly does that change?
$a = "foo"; list($b) = $a; var_dump($b);
This is weird... I wouldn't go as far as saying nobody uses it - since
experience shows there's somebody somewhere using any weird combination
of PHP features imaginable - but it's definitely a strange code. Even
though
Em Qua, 2008-03-26 às 23:43 -0300, Felipe Pena escreveu:
> 2008/3/26, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > - Removed undocumented and incomplete support for strings in list()
> > > operator. (Dmitry)
> >
> >
> > What exactly does that change?
>
> $a = "foo"; list($b) = $a; var_dump($b);
2008/3/26, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - Removed undocumented and incomplete support for strings in list()
> > operator. (Dmitry)
>
>
> What exactly does that change?
$a = "foo"; list($b) = $a; var_dump($b);
Before:
string(1) "f"
After (HEAD):
NULL
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtim
2008/3/26, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - Added "jump label" operator (limited "goto"). (Dmitry, Sara)
>
>
> No objection, while it adds yet another keyword.
>
Patch:
- http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/goto.diff
Patch full (with re2c regenerated files):
- http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/goto-wi
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 01:01 +0100, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > And compile time JIT is fine as long as we don't have
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 01:01 +0100, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > And compile time JIT is fine as long as we don't have to care for
> > encoding, right? So this change won't be needed in 5.3.
>
> Except when one s
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And compile time JIT is fine as long as we don't have to care for
> encoding, right? So this change won't be needed in 5.3.
Except when one sends a xxMB post that you are not expecting and will
not use. But that
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 00:48 +0100, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:04 -0300, Felipe Pena wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like know which itens below needs be backported to 5_3:
> >
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:04 -0300, Felipe Pena wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like know which itens below needs be backported to 5_3:
> >
> > - Added runtime JIT auto-globals fetching and caching. (Dmitry,
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:04 -0300, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like know which itens below needs be backported to 5_3:
>
> - Added runtime JIT auto-globals fetching and caching. (Dmitry, Sara)
Not sure if this has benefits without the encoding stuff which is
planned for PHP 6.
> -
17 matches
Mail list logo
