On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 at 14:19 Tom Worster wrote:
> Your fix seems fine for rand() but less so for mt_rand().
>
> Applying this fix will break much less mt_rand()-using code than not
> applying it will break rand()-using code. From that point of view,
> applying it is the better choice.
>
> Otoh, i
On 8/8/16 5:36 PM, Leigh wrote:
Hi all,
There has been an unforeseen break with rand() when the minimum value is
greater than the maximum.
Prior to 7.1 rand() would happily accept backwards parameters and return a
value, however in the 7.1 branch it now emits a warning and returns false.
I've