On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> looks like you're right - spl_object_hash() does in deed work... I
> guess I was mislead by some of the notes people made in the
> documentation... perhaps these should be moderated, and the
> documentation should be update to clear up some
looks like you're right - spl_object_hash() does in deed work... I
guess I was mislead by some of the notes people made in the
documentation... perhaps these should be moderated, and the
documentation should be update to clear up some of the mystery and
confusion that seems to surround this functio
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> the manual states, "The implementation in SplObjectStorage returns the
> same value as spl_object_hash()" - so I don't know how this would
> really work any better than a custom implementation.
>
> perhaps safer would be to simply implement a
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> Yeah, on that note - I've never understood what use this function is,
> as it reuses object IDs... it will return the same hash for two
> different objects during the same script execution - so it's unusable
> as far as getting unique keys fo
the manual states, "The implementation in SplObjectStorage returns the
same value as spl_object_hash()" - so I don't know how this would
really work any better than a custom implementation.
perhaps safer would be to simply implement a collection-type that
requires the classes of elements in the co
Yeah, on that note - I've never understood what use this function is,
as it reuses object IDs... it will return the same hash for two
different objects during the same script execution - so it's unusable
as far as getting unique keys for objects... and I don't know what
else you could really use it
> -Original Message-
> From: Rasmus Schultz [mailto:ras...@mindplay.dk]
> Sent: 07 October 2012 02:10
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Arrays which have properties of sets
>
> First off, let me say - as you pointed out, when the values
&
On Oct 7, 2012 3:10 AM, "Rasmus Schultz" wrote:
>
> Since I was the one who started this discussion, I'd like to reply to
> some of these points.
>
> First off, let me say - as you pointed out, when the values are
> unique, they are best represented
> as keys... however, this of course applies onl
Since I was the one who started this discussion, I'd like to reply to
some of these points.
First off, let me say - as you pointed out, when the values are
unique, they are best represented
as keys... however, this of course applies only to value-types, which
isn't the problem, and not
why I start
