Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-16 Thread Dennis Clarke
> On 01/15/2013 09:07 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Number of tests : 12276 8329 > > Tests skipped : 3947 ( 32.2%) > > Tests warned:0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) > > Tests failed:2 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) > > Expected fail : 36 ( 0.3%) ( 0.4%) > > Tests passed:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Christopher Jones
On 01/15/2013 06:18 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: Hi! I will try to wade through the logs tomorrow. At the moment I am doing the same process on RHEL and seeing a bucket of failures also. This URL has some potential to help, since it will show common failures other people are seeing: http://qa.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 01/15/2013 09:07 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Number of tests : 12276 8329 > Tests skipped : 3947 ( 32.2%) > Tests warned:0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) > Tests failed:2 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) > Expected fail : 36 ( 0.3%) ( 0.4%) > Tests passed: 8291 ( 67.5%) ( 9

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I will try to wade through the logs tomorrow. At the moment I am doing > the same process on RHEL and seeing a bucket of failures also. RHEL shouldn't have failures in core, though some extension tests may fail (unfortunately, error messages change or library versions change can trip up s

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Hi! > > > > > As for the odd test failing, I see this : > > That looks like a lot of failures in most basic scripts. I suspect > there's some unifying problem to that - what are the .diff files for > some of these failures, is there anything interesting in the PHP error > log? I will try to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Please mind that PHP is developed mostly on a volunteer basis and the > work is focused on primarily used platforms. If you want to provide > productive help we'd love having people going through those and provide > fixes for overly specific tests and identifying "broken" PHP features. I have a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > > We > > > focus those resources on the platforms used by 95% of our users. Feel > > > free to dig in and send us some patches. Needless to say, all of those > > > tests pass on Linux, FreeBSD and likely OSX as well. > > > > I will try that theory out on RHEL 6.3 and let you know. > > > > PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > > As for the odd test failing, I see this : That looks like a lot of failures in most basic scripts. I suspect there's some unifying problem to that - what are the .diff files for some of these failures, is there anything interesting in the PHP error log? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:19 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > I agree that Oracle has done the Solaris market no favours and were the > result of the death of OpenSolaris however, having said all that, Solaris > is a SUSv3 compliant commercial UNIX and thus one would think that > open source code writ

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Kris Craig
> > We > > focus those resources on the platforms used by 95% of our users. Feel > > free to dig in and send us some patches. Needless to say, all of those > > tests pass on Linux, FreeBSD and likely OSX as well. > > I will try that theory out on RHEL 6.3 and let you know. > PHP is hardly what I w

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > Those old Solaris servers are still out there churning away. > > Sure, but there are very few of you and we have limited resources. granted ... I get it. I do. I ran Blastwave for a decade on shoestring and prayer and kicked out several thousand SVR4 packages. I really do get it. > We > f

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 01/15/2013 05:19 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > I agree that Oracle has done the Solaris market no favours and were the > result of the death of OpenSolaris however, having said all that, Solaris > is a SUSv3 compliant commercial UNIX and thus one would think that > open source code written to com

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
> On 01/15/2013 05:03 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Really I would like to hear from the PHP folks on this as it seems > as if PHP is > > quite fragile or perhaps simply mysterious. > > I don't think any of us test on Solaris regularly, so you can expect the > odd test to fail, but in general

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 01/15/2013 05:03 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Really I would like to hear from the PHP folks on this as it seems as if PHP > is > quite fragile or perhaps simply mysterious. I don't think any of us test on Solaris regularly, so you can expect the odd test to fail, but in general it should buil

[PHP-DEV] Re: A problem related to php 5.4.10 and possibly others

2013-01-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
/** For the sake of getting this issue looked into I am going to cross post * to two maillists. Maybe the PHP folks see the issue and will reply with an * update. Who knows. */ Original message to the bison mailist : > Le 15 janv. 2013 à 00:19, Dennis Clarke a > écrit : > > >