Hi Rob,
Tank you for you extensive reply.
> -Original Message-
> A few comments from eyeballing the patch:
>
> - Depending upon how much c14n functionality there is to be,
> this might be better off as a standalone extension. This way
> it wouldn't be dependant upon DOM (especially if
A few comments from eyeballing the patch:
- Depending upon how much c14n functionality there is to be, this might
be better off as a standalone extension. This way it wouldn't be
dependant upon DOM (especially if PHP is built without it) and allow it
to work with simplexml alone. Take xsl for ex
> -Original Message-
> D.Kingma wrote:
>
> > Hi Rob / Chregu,
> >
> > As a first (small) step to implementing xml-security specs
> (dig-sign,
> > encryption) I created a patch against HEAD to expose
> (exclusive-)C14n
> > functionality from libxml2. I allows you to canonize a single n
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:24:02 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kingma | jool.nl) wrote:
> Hi Rob / Chregu,
>
> As a first (small) step to implementing xml-security specs
> (dig-sign, encryption) I created a patch against HEAD to expose
> (exclusive-)C14n functionality from libxml2. I allows you to
>
