At 11:25 AM 4/28/2005 +0100, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 10:16 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:28 PM 4/27/2005 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
> >
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 10:16 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:28 PM 4/27/2005 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
> >>that's why I don't want to have language features a
At 17:44 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
Hmm. As I mentioned to Christian in a private email, I have a system which is
350K LOC. Now not all of that gets loaded at one time of course (thank God
for __autoload()!), but there are times when a significant proportion of it
is loaded. And then it mun
Hi,
Duncan McIntyre wrote:
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
in PHP5.
Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
memory?
It's feat
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> > >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> > >in PHP5.
> > >
> > >Out of interest, how is this more bloated th
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> >in PHP5.
> >
> >Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
> > memory?
>
> It's feature b
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> >in PHP5.
> >
> >Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
> > memory?
>
> It's feature b
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I'm not too thrilled about this deal. I don't think I'd be in favour of
> accepting this attributes patch regardless of just about anything else. Not
> sure how others feel about it, but at least in my opinion, this feature is a
> clear 'no no' for PHP.
At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
in PHP5.
Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in memory?
It's feature bloat, not memory consumption bloat. Adding obscure operators
is the worst t
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 1:28 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
> >[snip]
> >But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
> >that's why I don't want to have language features added for it (-:C
>
> I wholeheartedly agree.
>
> Zeev
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
