On 10/03/2016 20:19, Lester Caine wrote:
I have no problem with code needing to be
updated, it's the unnecessary pressure that it has to be done now when
there is no gain currently from spending that time.
To be clear, the pressure added by this deprecation would be to do it
"sometime in the n
On 10/03/16 17:16, Colin O'Dell wrote:
> - Ensuring that all major arguments for & against have been documented.
While the no-brain conversion of one to the other may be acceptable to
some, it's both the follow though on associated documentation and a
proper review of the code which is CURRENTLY t
My apologies, I posted the wrong discussion link. Here's the correct one:
http://markmail.org/message/wn3ykdwgplfctho7
Colin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:14 PM Colin O'Dell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have completed my initial draft of the RFC to deprecate "var" in favor
> of "public": https://wik
