Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Personally I like the current syntax more and don't see any reason to
> change it.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Hello Internals, Dmitry, Lukas, Johannes,
>>
>> some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
>> position and not at
I like how the current syntax forces you to define what your importing right
next to the function signature. It's easy to waste time debugging if your
assumptions about what's being imported into scope are wrong.
Erik Schulz - gradbot @ gmail, yahoo, aim
Software Engineer, Vulcan Inc.
On Wed, J
Personally I like the current syntax more and don't see any reason to
change it.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Internals, Dmitry, Lukas, Johannes,
some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
position and not at the same place as 'global' or 'static' wh
