On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:43 AM David Walker wrote:
> [Sorry if this is a second time you get this, but email issues and all]
>
> Hi All,
>
> I had mentioned the other day my desire to look at, and attempt
> implementation of allowing by-reference assignment within list()'s. Andrea
> had created
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:15 PM Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Regarding the =& open issue in the RFC, I don't think the =& syntax
> makes sense to me. The thing on the right-hand side of a list()
> assignment is the array, not its values. It makes no difference for the
> purposes of assigning from its v
Hi Dave,
Regarding the =& open issue in the RFC, I don't think the =& syntax
makes sense to me. The thing on the right-hand side of a list()
assignment is the array, not its values. It makes no difference for the
purposes of assigning from its values if the array is a reference or
not, so I'd
