Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:32:25 PM, you wrote: MB>>> It respects the refcoutning while destructing the zvals. > I don't exacetly understand _how_ it respects them so that this solves the > circular dependency problem. In fact, in the patch in the URL you have > sent I don'

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
MB>> It respects the refcoutning while destructing the zvals. I don't exacetly understand _how_ it respects them so that this solves the circular dependency problem. In fact, in the patch in the URL you have sent I don't even see one call to destructor. Also, does you patch take into account th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, Thursday, November 27, 2003, 1:28:36 PM, you wrote: MB>>> Ok, sure we care in request shutdown but at least page delivery isn't MB>>> affected by the patch. > Definitely it is. The fact that it's _next_ page delivery that would be > affected is not helping much - any page but

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
MB>> Ok, sure we care in request shutdown but at least page delivery isn't MB>> affected by the patch. Definitely it is. The fact that it's _next_ page delivery that would be affected is not helping much - any page but the very first since server run is the next for some page and it is reasonab

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, Thursday, November 27, 2003, 1:00:20 PM, you wrote: MB>>> with 1 < c < 1.1. Since we never cared about shutdown time this MB>>> should be ok > If we are talking about request shutdown, we definitely do care about it. > Slower is the request shutdown, more time the httpd process

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
MB>> with 1 < c < 1.1. Since we never cared about shutdown time this MB>> should be ok If we are talking about request shutdown, we definitely do care about it. Slower is the request shutdown, more time the httpd process/thread takes per request, more load on the server. -- Stanislav Malyshev,

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Derick, Thursday, November 27, 2003, 11:54:07 AM, you wrote: > Hey, > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> Now that we're at a very advanced stage and the code freeze is coming up, I >> think it'd be a good idea to start running some PHP 4 applications on PHP 5 >> and see how easy

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Andi Gutmans
What had to be patched? Is it something we can fix or add to a compatibility mode? Andi At 11:24 AM 11/27/2003 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Ivan, same for me with a two weeks old 5b2-dev. It also runs other applications and only one had to be patched (i didn't knew it was running n the se

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Compatibility problems with PHP 5

2003-11-27 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Ivan, same for me with a two weeks old 5b2-dev. It also runs other applications and only one had to be patched (i didn't knew it was running n the server). Thursday, November 27, 2003, 10:51:34 AM, you wrote: > Hi Andi, I try phpmyadmin with php 5.0.0beta1 under Red Hat 9 and works > perfe