Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-18 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > > > Is it OK with latest HEAD? I saw Rasmus commited a patch. > > > > Yes, works in HEAD now. > > But now I get a link error: > > gcc: /usr/lib/libtidy.so: N

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Is it OK with latest HEAD? I saw Rasmus commited a patch. > > Yes, works in HEAD now. But now I get a link error: gcc: /usr/lib/libtidy.so: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dat/dev/php/php-5.

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Is it OK with latest HEAD? I saw Rasmus commited a patch. Yes, works in HEAD now. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
Is it OK with latest HEAD? I saw Rasmus commited a patch. Andi At 11:53 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > I fixed this in the 4.3 branch a while ago but there were a lot of cries > from the peanut gallery on the validity of the fix: > > http

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Add the same fix there on line 71 On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > I fixed this in the 4.3 branch a while ago but there were a lot of cries > > from the peanut gallery on the validity of the fix: > > > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > I fixed this in the 4.3 branch a while ago but there were a lot of cries > from the peanut gallery on the validity of the fix: > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/gd/libgd/gdft.c?sbt=1&login=2&r1=1.11.2.10&r2=1.11.2.11&ty=h > > I still think it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
I fixed this in the 4.3 branch a while ago but there were a lot of cries from the peanut gallery on the validity of the fix: http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/gd/libgd/gdft.c?sbt=1&login=2&r1=1.11.2.10&r2=1.11.2.11&ty=h I still think it is the correct fix and will MFB it in a bit. -Rasmus

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > OK, I re-rolled on snaps. I think we should address this issue in the > future because it doesn't make sense that we can only roll one specific > machine because it has some libtool patch. > You can download the tars from http://snaps.php.net/~andi > If t

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Andi, On 17 Dec 2003, at 22:29, Andi Gutmans wrote: Please give the tar ball a short sanity check to see that it builds fine. You can get it at http://cvs.php.net/~andi/ I'll re-roll B3 in the morning (10 hours from now) unless I hear of something critical. is that package supposed to include

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Please give the tar ball a short sanity check to see that it builds fine. > You can get it at http://cvs.php.net/~andi/ > I'll re-roll B3 in the morning (10 hours from now) unless I hear of > something critical. I get this error on running ./buildconf &&