[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / README.NEW-OUTPUT-API

2006-06-04 Thread Michael Wallner
Andi Gutmans wrote: Can you give a short summary of what the essence of the change is and how the APIs have changed (Both the ones available to the PHP developer and to the extension writer?) To come back to that topic; there are certainly some implications to think about, some of the top o

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / README.NEW-OUTPUT-API /ext/pgsql pgsql.c/ext/session session.c /ext/soap soap.c /ext/standard basic_functions.chead.c info.c url_scanner_ex.c url_scanner

2006-06-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
Definitely evil :) At 03:39 PM 6/2/2006, Michael Wallner wrote: Antony Dovgal wrote: On 03.06.2006 00:56, Andi Gutmans wrote: Btw, any reason why we need all those redefinition of functions? If it's just to save having to write TSRMLS_C then I'd prefer to remove those macros. They just make d

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / README.NEW-OUTPUT-API

2006-06-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Michael, in streams api they at least make sense because the yuse the same technology using in a bunch of zend functions to pass a bit more information about the callee :-) - but here that is not done so i also see no reason for that. They were actually intended t

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / README.NEW-OUTPUT-API /ext/pgsqlpgsql.c /ext/session session.c /ext/soap soap.c /ext/standardbasic_functions.c head.c info.c url_scanner_ex.c url_scanner_ex.r

2006-06-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Andi Gutmans wrote: Can you give a short summary of what the essence of the change is and how the APIs have changed (Both the ones available to the PHP developer and to the extension writer?) The original README had a short example, but it became obsolete by porting the code to HEAD. I will c

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / README.NEW-OUTPUT-API /ext/pgsql pgsql.c/ext/session session.c /ext/soap soap.c /ext/standard basic_functions.chead.c info.c url_scanner_ex.c url_scanner_ex.r

2006-06-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Antony Dovgal wrote: On 03.06.2006 00:56, Andi Gutmans wrote: Btw, any reason why we need all those redefinition of functions? If it's just to save having to write TSRMLS_C then I'd prefer to remove those macros. They just make debugging harder I have to second that - those macros basically a